Case Summary
Shiny, the plaintiff, filed a petition to review an earlier order and restore the suit. The defendants were served with notice but remained absent, leading to the court granting the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Suit restored on file
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition seeking to review an order and restored the suit to the file.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was within time and justified based on the interest of justice.
The petition was within time and justified based on the interest of justice.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition was within time and justified based on the interest of justice.
The petition was within time and justified based on the interest of justice.
Supporting Evidence
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and in the interest of justice I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner to proceed with the case.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition allowed. Order dated 06/12/2024 is reviewed and the suit restored on file.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shiny
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sharafudheen
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nisa
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Accompanying affidavit
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jiju Babu.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
to review the order dated 06/12/2024 and to restore the suit on file
Evidence:
Hence petition allowed. Order dated 06/12/2024 is reviewed and the suit restored on file.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Review Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shiny vs Sharafudheen et al regarding review of an order
Case Code Year
Case between Shiny vs Sharafudheen et al regarding review of an order