Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP. No.32/2025 in OS.No 1085/2023

Case between Khulsam Beevi vs Kamarudeen et al regarding review of suit withdrawal

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-06-25
Duration
approximately-6 months
Case Closed
Wed, 01/15/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Khulsam Beevi filed a review petition regarding the withdrawal of her case against Kamarudeen and others. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant forcibly obtained her thumb impression to withdraw the suit without her consent.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The review petition filed by Khulsam Beevi was dismissed as the plaintiff had voluntarily withdrawn the case and failed to substantiate new claims.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
The review petition filed by Khulsam Beevi was dismissed as the plaintiff had voluntarily withdrawn the case and failed to substantiate new claims.
Key Reasoning:
The withdrawal of the suit was deemed voluntary and the new claims were unsupported by evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff had already withdrawn the case and failed to substantiate the new claims, the orders in IA 5/2024 and IA 6/2024 could not be reviewed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Khulsam Beevi
Party Age
75
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kamarudeen
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shanifa
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nujumudeen
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramees
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M. Muhammed Humayoon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Chandrasekharan Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Withdrawal
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to withdraw the suit.
Evidence:
the court found that the plaintiff had voluntarily filed applications to withdraw the suit and to charge their Advocate, both of which were allowed and the case was dismissed as withdrawn on 15/01/2025.
Relief Type: Review of order
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought to review the orders in IA 5/2024 and IA 6/2024.
Evidence:
the review petition was held to be not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Review Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Khulsam Beevi vs Kamarudeen et al regarding review of suit withdrawal
Case Code Year
Case between Khulsam Beevi vs Kamarudeen et al regarding review of suit withdrawal

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Wed, 01/15/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sivadasan Pillai vs Pushpa Kumari et al regarding review of an order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Review Petition Unknown
Case between Sunilkumar vs Rajani regarding review of order
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Review Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Branch Manager, Indian Bank vs Suresh.B regarding review of order
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, KOLLAM
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Binu.V. vs Syamkumar regarding review of prior order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Review Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between UCO Bank vs Janasree Sangam et al regarding review of a previous order
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Review Petition Plaintiff Won