Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.214/2025

Case between Sheefek T. M. vs Anas K. Muhammedali regarding restraining obstruction of pathway

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-09-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sheefek T. M. is the petitioner seeking to restrain Anas K. Muhammedali from obstructing the pathway as per the plaint D schedule. The court found in favor of the petitioner regarding the balance of convenience.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court restrained the respondents from altering the nature of the plaint D schedule pathway and obstructing the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court restrained the respondents from altering the nature of the plaint D schedule pathway and obstructing the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioner has made out a prima facie case and the balance of convenience was found in favor of the petitioner.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Petitioner has made out a prima facie case and the balance of convenience was found in favor of the petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that Petitioner has made out a prima facie case. Balance of convenience also found in favor of petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondents are restrained from altering lie and nature of plaint D schedule pathway and also from obstructing the petitioners are of plaint D schedule pathway.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sheefek T. M.
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anas K. Muhammedali
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. R. Bejoy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M. S. Ajith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Balram S. A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Swathy S. A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Revathy Ramesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nandini R. S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajsree S. S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Muhammed Hassan Bava
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Athyra J. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents are restrained from altering lie and nature of plaint D schedule pathway and also from obstructing the petitioners are of plaint D schedule pathway.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that Petitioner has made out a prima facie case. Balance of convenience also found in favor of petitioner. Hence the respondents are restrained from altering lie and nature of plaint D schedule pathway and also from obstructing the petitioners are of plaint D schedule pathway (under further order).

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sheefek T. M. vs Anas K. Muhammedali regarding restraining obstruction of pathway
Case Code Year
Case between Sheefek T. M. vs Anas K. Muhammedali regarding restraining obstruction of pathway

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor, Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won