Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 45/2025

Case between Sharlimon M.K vs Santhosh regarding temporary prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sharlimon M.K, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary prohibitory injunction against Santhosh, the defendant, who is allegedly threatening to misuse blank signed cheques and stamp papers. The plaintiff claims a significant amount is due, while the defendant denies the allegations and states he has been threatened.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a temporary prohibitory injunction in part, allowing some relief to the petitioner while denying the full request. The injunction restrains the defendant from interfering with the peaceful living or conduct of business by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary prohibitory injunction restraining the respondent from interfering with the peaceful living or conduct of business by the petitioner.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary prohibitory injunction in part, allowing some relief to the petitioner while denying the full request. The injunction restrains the defendant from interfering with the peaceful living or conduct of business by the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that there was a prima facie case and potential for irreparable injury, justifying the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that there was a prima facie case and potential for irreparable injury, justifying the injunction.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner has, in his affidavit, raised a reasonable apprehension as regards the same. Financial transactions as between the parties and the liability owed as a result of the same is also evident from the pleading on record.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is partly allowed as follows :- An order of temporary injunction is passed by restraining the respondent, his men and agents from interfering with the peaceful living or conduct of business by the petitioner or from doing any act (in an illegal or unlawful manner) in such a way putting the petitioner or his family members in fear.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sharlimon M.K
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhosh
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Documents regarding the financial transaction and security cheques.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.T Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jose Paul Thottam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Fathima Razak
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswini Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jibymon Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aginov Mathappan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sherin Mohan K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jinu T. Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Temporary prohibitory injunction restraining the respondent from interfering with the peaceful living or conduct of business by the petitioner.
Evidence:
In view of the discussions made above, the point IV is to be answered by granting a relief in a molded manner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court noted the blank signed cheques received by the defendant as security for repayment.
Reference:
Document Type: Stamp Paper
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court acknowledged the blank signed stamp papers received by the defendant as security for repayment.
Reference:
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The court heard both sides and considered their statements.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Sharlimon M.K vs Santhosh regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sharlimon M.K vs Santhosh regarding temporary prohibitory injunction

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Aseeb vs Nahas et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Nicolas P Dias et al vs M.K.Aboobacker et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Coconut Grove Residents Association vs Maradu Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Karthika Pradeep vs Sulthana Habeeb et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won