Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 43/2025

Case between Shaji S vs Nandhu Raveendran regarding Suit for realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-11-21
Duration
approximately-0 years 0 days
Case Closed
Fri, 11/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Shaji S, was an employee in the Kottayam Municipality and was a surety for a loan taken by the defendant, Nandhu Raveendran, for educational purposes. After the defendant failed to repay the loan, the plaintiff filed this suit to recover the amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by the plaintiff was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 1,58,328/- along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
It is ordered that the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 1,58,328/- (Rupees one lakh fifty eight thousand three hundred and twenty eight only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiff was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 1,58,328/- along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; 1.It is ordered that the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 1,58,328/- (Rupees one lakh fifty eight thousand three hundred and twenty eight only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum for the amount of Rs.1,21,500/- from the date of decree till its realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shaji S
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nandhu Raveendran
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of the Ledger Loan Account Statement, Copy of OTS notice, Copy of notice, Office copy of suit notice, Postal Receipts, A/D Card, Postal cover returned unclaimed, Copy of request for Certification, Reply to the request letter from Asst. General Manager.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G R Panicker
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant to pay the plaintiff the sum of ₹1,58,328/- with interest.
Evidence:
It is ordered that the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 1,58,328/- (Rupees one lakh fifty eight thousand three hundred and twenty eight only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum for the amount of Rs.1,21,500/- from the date of decree till its realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover costs.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of the Ledger Loan Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided evidence of the loan account details.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of OTS notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notified the defendant regarding the loan settlement options.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served notice related to loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A2(a)
Document Type: Copy of notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served another reminder notice for loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A2(b)
Document Type: Office copy of suit notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Official notice issued for the lawsuit.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of postage related to the various notices.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Specific postal receipt linked to loan communication.
Reference:
Ext.A4(a)
Document Type: A/d Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of delivery for an important notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal cover returned unclaimed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicated the defendant's refusal to accept notices.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Copy of request for Certification under Section (65B) 63 of BSA, 2023
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Formally requested certification pertinent to electronic evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Reply to the request letter from Asst. General Manager, Kerala State Backward Classes Development Corporation Ltd
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Response that supported the plaintiff's claim regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shaji S vs Nandhu Raveendran regarding Suit for realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Shaji S vs Nandhu Raveendran regarding Suit for realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Wed, 11/19/2025 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 11/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nattakom Service Co-Operative Bank et al vs Roy V.J. et al regarding Decree
Munsiff Court/Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between N.M.Sivarajan vs George Varghese @ Georgekutty, Anil Varghese, Aliyamma regarding compromise petition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between N.A.George et al vs T.C. Ipe et al regarding declaration and injunction
Principal Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Abraham Philipose et al vs John Mathyas et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran. T.U vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won