Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 187 OF 2015

Case between Shaji et al vs Rajan et al regarding Mandatory Injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-01-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by Shaji and others, filed a suit against the defendants, led by Rajan and others, seeking a mandatory injunction. However, both parties were absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default as neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants were present for the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Mandatory Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants were present for the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Not applicable
Why Defendant Won:
Not applicable
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shaji
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajjith
Party Age
26
Relation
null
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreejith
Party Age
24
Relation
null
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sarath
Party Age
22
Relation
null
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajan
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kotha
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pushpa
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ravi
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Suresh A. Alingal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Najmudheen.P.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.T.P. Abdul Jabbar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.M. Shihab
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default, which implies that the requested mandatory injunction was not granted.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Mandatory injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shaji et al vs Rajan et al regarding Mandatory Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Shaji et al vs Rajan et al regarding Mandatory Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 01/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Aravindakshan Nair vs Thahasildar et al regarding Mandatory Injunction and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Mandatory Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Peedikakandi Beerankoya vs Cheruvayalil Byju regarding Mandatory Injunction
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Mandatory Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Pavithra Satheesan vs General Convener et al regarding mandatory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Mandatory Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Vismaya.M., Sindhu vs The State of Kerala et al regarding Mandatory injunction
MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Mandatory injunction Defendant Won
Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won