Case Summary
Shahul Hameed filed a suit against Abdul Rasheed for recovery of money, but the suit was rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee and lack of plaintiff representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not applicable
Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Recovery
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by Shahul Hameed against Abdul Rasheed for money recovery was rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee and lack of plaintiff representation.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for money. No balance court fee seen remitted. No representation from the plaintiff. Hence plaint is hereby rejected as per order 7 Rule 11 of Civil Procedure Code.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shahul Hameed
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Rasheed
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Mujeeb Rahiman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Neethu.P.T.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Recovery
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Money Recovery
Case Code
Case between Shahul Hameed vs Abdul Rasheed regarding money suit
Case Code Year
Case between Shahul Hameed vs Abdul Rasheed regarding money suit