Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No.128/2023

Case between Shahira vs Nisamudheen regarding declaration of share over bank deposit

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-06-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shahira is petitioning for a declaration of her one-ninth share over a bank deposit made by her deceased father. The respondent, Nisamudheen, is alleged to have withdrawn the entire amount despite the plaintiff's claim to the estate under Muslim personal law.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that it has territorial jurisdiction to try the suit based on the plaintiff's claim to her share in the estate of her deceased father. The claim is valid as part of the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that it has territorial jurisdiction to try the suit based on the plaintiff's claim to her share in the estate of her deceased father. The claim is valid as part of the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court held that the locality of the plaintiff and the issuance of notice from within the jurisdiction support the claim for territorial jurisdiction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court held that the locality of the plaintiff and the issuance of notice from within the jurisdiction support the claim for territorial jurisdiction.
Supporting Evidence
In the present case, the notice demanding partition and payment of the plaintiff’s share was issued from within the territorial limits of this Court.

Judgment Evidence:

The court finds that this Court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain and try the present suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shahira
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nisamudheen
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C R Gayathri
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A Vijayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vishnu R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Cathrine Bernard
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shahira vs Nisamudheen regarding declaration of share over bank deposit
Case Code Year
Case between Shahira vs Nisamudheen regarding declaration of share over bank deposit

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won