Case Summary
Selvin T Augustin is the complainant against Anoop N P for an offence under section 138 of the N.I. Act. The matter has been settled and the complaint is dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the complaint is settled and dismissed the case.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant did not press the complaint.
The complainant did not press the complaint.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The complainant present and submitted that matter is settled and the compliant is not pressed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the complaint is dismissed under section 257 of Cr.PC. Accused is acquitted.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Selvin T Augustin
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anoop N P
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Justin Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Solimol Sebastian
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajesh Pallat
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Complaint is dismissed as the matter is settled and not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence the complaint is dismissed under section 257 of Cr.PC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Selvin T Augustin vs Anoop N P regarding U/s.138 of N.I. Act
Case Code Year
Case between Selvin T Augustin vs Anoop N P regarding U/s.138 of N.I. Act
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Out-of-Court Settlement
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act