Case Summary
The complainant Unnikrishnan K.R filed a complaint against the accused Shamnas under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant later filed a petition to withdraw the complaint, which was accepted by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint was withdrawn by the complainant, leading to the acquittal of the accused under Section 257 Cr.P.C.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, complaint is withdrawn and the accused is acquitted u/s 257 Cr.P.C. He is set at liberty.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Unnikrishnan K.R
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shamnas
- Party Age
- 40
Plaintiffs Documents
CMP 7/2025
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Saiju P. Mathews
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sanju Raju
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A.S. Salim
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
complaint is withdrawn and the accused is acquitted
Evidence:
complainant filed CMP 7/2025 to withdraw the complaint. For the reasons stated therein, petition is accepted. Hence, complaint is withdrawn and the accused is acquitted u/s 257 Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Unnikrishnan K.R vs Shamnas regarding withdrawal of complaint
Case Code Year
Case between Unnikrishnan K.R vs Shamnas regarding withdrawal of complaint
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act