Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 37/2023

Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Reji Thomas et al regarding realization of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-07-25
Duration
Case Code No.
37
Case Closed
Fri, 07/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Self Employers Service Society, disbursed a loan to the defendants who failed to repay it. The suit was filed to recover the outstanding amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff with the defendants ordered to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 1,35,942 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff with the defendants ordered to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence adduced by the plaintiff established their case, showing the defendants' failure to repay.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence adduced by the plaintiff established their case, showing the defendants' failure to repay.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 1,35,942 (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Five Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Two only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum for the principal amount of 75,000.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Self Employers Service Society
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Reji Thomas
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Yatheendran K N
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Karuppa Swamy M
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shiji Joseph
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
06.01.2020 Loan Application, 16.01.2020 The Demand Promissory Note, 16.01.2020 Consent Letter, 16.01.2020 Agreement, 30.11.2022 Statement of Accounts, 07.01.2023 Copy of Lawyers Notice, 14.07.2025 By law of Plaintiff Society, 14.07.2025 Copy of the Registration Certificate, 04.01.2019 Copy of letter from District Registrar office Kottayam, 14.01.2023 Authorization Letter.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Somaraj. S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of the outstanding loan amount with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 1,35,942 (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Five Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Two only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of costs from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the loan application submitted by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the defendants' promise to repay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Consent letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter consenting to the terms of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document outlining the terms of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document detailing the outstanding balance of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Lawyers Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the defendants demanding repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipts evidencing the delivery of the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: By law of Plaintiff Society
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document establishing the legal framework under which the plaintiff operates.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Copy of the Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate showing that the plaintiff is a registered society.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Copy of letter from District Registrar office Kottayam
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Official communication from the district registrar.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Authorization letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter authorizing the member to represent the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/06/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 07/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Biby John vs Swapna Ibrahimkutty et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd. vs Soniya Roy et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mathew Skariah et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Sinimol M.M., Dileep E.J., Shajimon E.B., Aradhana P.S. regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Pukadiyil Traders et al vs Bimlesh Kumar Sigh regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won