O.S. 528/2022

Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Mrs. Bindu Anil et al regarding plaint rejection.

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM

Judge

Smt. Indu. P. Raj

Order Date

2025-12-02

Duration

Case Code No.

528

Case Closed

Tue, 12/02/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Self Employers Service Society, represented by Mr. M.V. Josekutty, filed the suit against Mrs. Bindu Anil and others. The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-payment of court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The plaint was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-payment of the court fees.

Key Reasoning:
The plaint was dismissed due to the absence of representation and non-payment of court fees.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was dismissed due to the absence of representation and non-payment of court fees.

Supporting Evidence

The court observed the plaintiff's absence and the non-payment of court fees.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Self Employers Service Society

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mrs. Bindu Anil
Party Age: 51
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mr. Anilkumar.K.K
Party Age: 61
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mr. Shanlal P.R
Party Age: 43
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mr. Anoop Johnson
Party Age: 36
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Adv. Somaraj.S
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Adv. E.S.Sukumaran Nair
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

The plaint was rejected due to no balance court fee being paid.

Evidence: