Case Summary
Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd is the plaintiff represented by Mr.M.V. Josekutty. The suit was rejected due to balance court fee not being remitted.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled that the suit is rejected due to the balance court fee not being remitted.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected based on procedural grounds.
The suit was rejected based on procedural grounds.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected based on procedural grounds.
The suit was rejected based on procedural grounds.
Supporting Evidence
Balance Court Fee not remitted.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vasundaran
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Beneetha Joseph
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- G.Sankarlal
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raji P.K.
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Benny Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. James Mathen K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit is rejected.
Evidence:
Suit is rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd vs Vasundaran et al regarding suit rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd vs Vasundaran et al regarding suit rejection