Case Summary
The petitioner is Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd. represented by M.V.Josekutty. The respondents are Naibu Luke and others. The case is about the petitioner's request to condone the delay in filing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil
Final Judgment
No
The court denied the petitioner's request to condone the delay.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner did not satisfactorily explain the reasons for condoning the delay.
The petitioner did not satisfactorily explain the reasons for condoning the delay.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner did not satisfactorily explain the reasons for condoning the delay.
The petitioner did not satisfactorily explain the reasons for condoning the delay.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner has not properly explained the reasons for condoning the delay.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition can not be allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd.
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Naibu Luke
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Simi Naibu
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Faisal K.Muhammed
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sanajudeen P.S
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Petition for condonation of delay
Evidence:
The petitioner has not properly explained the reasons for condoning the delay. Hence petition can not be allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2024