Case Summary
Asha Mery Mathew and others filed a restoration petition against Vidhya and others. The court allowed the petition as the respondent had no objection.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court decided to allow the restoration petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent had no objection to the petition.
The respondent had no objection to the petition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The respondent has no objection.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Asha Mery Mathew
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- D/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Joli Mathew
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vidhya
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Navan Narayanan
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed as the respondent has no objection.
Evidence:
Hence petition is allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2025