Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
EXECUTION PETITION No. 195 OF 2018

Case between The Secretary, Kalpakanchery Service Co-Operative Bank Society LTD. vs Chenganakkattil Marakkar regarding execution of decree

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-08-09
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition for execution of a decree by arrest and detention of the respondent for non-compliance with a payment decree. The petitioner claims the respondent has sufficient means to pay the decree debt but is willfully neglecting to do so.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the respondent has sufficient means to pay the decree debt and willfully neglected to do so. An arrest warrant was issued against the respondent for non-compliance.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Issue Arrest Warrant against the respondent.
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved the respondent has sufficient means to pay the decree debt.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, means of the respondent is proved. Issue Arrest Warrant against the respondent.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

The Secretary, Kalpakanchery Service Co-Operative Bank Society LTD. (Age not specified years) No.M-1808, Kalpakanchery.P.O.

Defendants

Chenganakkattil Marakkar (Age not specified years) Kallingal Thanneerchal, Kalpakanchery amsom desom, P.O.Kalpakanchery, Tirur Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner requested the arrest and detention of the respondent in civil prison for non-compliance with the decree.
Evidence:
Therefore, the point is found in favour of the petitioner. In the result, means of the respondent is proved. Issue Arrest Warrant against the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the ownership of the property and supports the petitioner's claim that the respondent has sufficient means to pay the decree debt.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Prescription
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
These documents were presented by the respondent to support his claim of suffering from ailments and lack of means.
Reference:
Ext.B1 to B8

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases