Case Summary
The plaintiff, Satheesan, was absent during the proceedings. The case was ultimately dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff was absent during the hearing and did not present their case.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent, Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Satheesan
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- SNDP Yogam No.3542 Oorakkadu Sakha
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- SNDP Yogam No.3542 Oorakkadu Sakha
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Radhakrishnan
- Party Age
- 65
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M P Santhosh
- Party Age
- 38
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V K Vasu
- Party Age
- 62
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Balakrishnan V R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ajay N S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent, Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Satheesan vs SNDP Yogam No.3542 Oorakkadu Sakha et al regarding Suit dismissed for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Satheesan vs SNDP Yogam No.3542 Oorakkadu Sakha et al regarding Suit dismissed for default.