Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.327/2019

Case between Sasikumar vs Anitha Pushparaj regarding suit dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-08-06
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Sasikumar and Sreekumar, filed a suit against the defendants, Anitha Pushparaj and Jayakumar. The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed because the plaintiffs were absent during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Evidence:

Since plaintiff absent, suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sasikumar (56 years) Lakshmivilasam, Airapuram Kara, Airapuram Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Sreekumar (50 years) Sreenilayam, Airapuram Kara, Airapuram Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Defendants

Anitha Pushparaj (40 years) Venduveli House, Airapuram Kara, Airapuram Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Jayakumar (48 years) Vadakkedathu Puthen House, Airapuram Kara, Airapuram Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent, suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases