Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 149/2019

Case between Sasikala vs Nandini et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff Pala
Judge
Sri. Hasheem S
Order Date
2025-10-30
Duration
approximately-6 years 9 months
Case Closed
Thu, 10/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a partition dispute over properties belonging to the deceased father of the plaintiff, Krishnan. The plaintiff Sasikala claims a rightful share, while the defendants contest her claims based on various relationships.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for partition filed by the plaintiff Sasikala. It ruled in favor of the second defendant, Nandini, who successfully proved the validity of the Will of the deceased.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for partition filed by the plaintiff Sasikala. It ruled in favor of the second defendant, Nandini, who successfully proved the validity of the Will of the deceased.
Key Reasoning:
The second defendant proved the execution and validity of the Will as per the required legal standards.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaint schedule properties are not partitionable, and the 2nd defendant proved Ext.B2 Will as contemplated under section 63(c) of the Indian Succession Act.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: 1. The suit is dismissed. 2. There is no order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sasikala
Party Age
56
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nandini
Party Age
75
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chithra
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasanna
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Narayanan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Release Deed No. 1521/1998 of SRO, Ramapuram, Certified Copy of Deed No. 1438/84 of SRO, Ramapuram, Death Certificate of K. R Krishnan, Certified copy of Marriage Register of SNDP Yogam, Kudayathoor
Defendants Documents
Power of Attorney of Chitra given to Sahadevan, Will Deed No. 100/2010 of SRO, Ramapuram, Sale Deed No. 819/2000 of SRO Ramapuram

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. S Bissimon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sruthy Lakshmi Ajith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff's request for partition of the properties was rejected.
Evidence:
The upshot of the discussion is that the plaint schedule properties are not partitionable.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Release deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Release Deed No. 1521/1998 of SRO, Ramapuram executed by the 2nd defendant in favor of her father.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified Copy of Deed No. 1438/84 of SRO, Ramapuram concerning purchasing property in the name of the 2nd defendant's mother.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Death Certificate of K. R Krishnan, establishing the death of the plaintiff's father.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Marriage Register
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Marriage Register of SNDP Yogam, Kudayathoor, proving the marriage between Krishnan and Nandini.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Marriage Register
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marriage Register of SNDP Yogam, Kudayathoor, further supporting the marriage claim.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt from Village Office Ramapuram related to the scheduled properties.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Power of Attorney of Chitra given to Sahadevan, representing the 2nd defendant's interests.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Will Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Will Deed No. 100/2010 of SRO, Ramapuram executed by Krishnan in favor of the 2nd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Sale Deed No. 819/2000 of SRO Ramapuram concerning the plaint schedule 'B' property.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Certified Copy
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Certified Copy of Thandapper No. 4034 relevant to property assessments.
Reference:
Ext.X1
Document Type: Inheritance Certificate
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Certified copy of Inheritance Certificate indicating legal heirs.
Reference:
Ext.X2
Document Type: Marriage Register Page
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Certified copy of page No. 31 of Marriage Register supporting marriage evidence.
Reference:
Ext.X3
Document Type: Marriage Certificate
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Certified copy of Marriage Certificate relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.X4
Document Type: Marriage Register
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Certified copy of Marriage Register of SNDP Yogam, Ramapuram No. 161 in support of marriage claims.
Reference:
Ext.X5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Inheritance dispute
Case Code
Case between Sasikala vs Nandini et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Sasikala vs Nandini et al regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
Pala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Case Filed
Wed, 10/30/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 10/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 10/28/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mathew vs Ann Thottakkara et al regarding declaration of title and possession
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kavumkandam Granites et al vs Jomon Joseph regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Joy Joseph vs Authorised Officer et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Pentatech Associates et al vs Benny Abraham regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Roy Joseph vs Tomy Joseph regarding partition and fixation of boundary.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won