Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O. S. No. 223/2023

Case between Mathew vs Ann Thottakkara et al regarding declaration of title and possession

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Judge
Kavya S. S
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration
approximately-2 years 21 days
Case Closed
Fri, 04/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mathew, seeks a declaration of his title and possession over a property previously owned by T.T Joseph. The defendants, legal heirs of the deceased T.T Joseph, did not appear in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, declaring his title and possession over the property. The defendants are restrained from trespassing into the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Title and possession of plaintiff over plaint schedule property is hereby declared and defendants are restrained from trespassing.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, declaring his title and possession over the property. The defendants are restrained from trespassing into the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided unrebutted evidence proving his ownership and possession of the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided unrebutted evidence proving his ownership and possession of the property.
Supporting Evidence
From the unrebutted evidence of PW1 and Exts.A1 to A4, it is proved that plaintiff is the absolute owner in possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed without costs as follows; 1) Title and possession of plaintiff over plaint schedule property is hereby declared. 2) Defendants and their men are hereby restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mathew
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ann Thottakkara
Party Age
80
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jude Thaddeus
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rose Thottakkara
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Theresa Thottakkara
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 1014/1/1991, Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 1018/1/1991, Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 217/1/2002, Tax receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jaimon Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration of title and possession of the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed without costs as follows; 1) Title and possession of plaintiff over plaint schedule property is hereby declared.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Defendants and their men are hereby restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from dispossessing the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 1014/1991 of SRO Kozhuvanal which shows prior ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 1018/1991 of SRO Kozhuvanal which indicates further ownership transfer.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 217/2002 of SRO Kozhuvanal which confirms the plaintiff's purchase of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt demonstrating the plaintiff's responsibility for property taxes.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Declaration of title
Case Code
Case between Mathew vs Ann Thottakkara et al regarding declaration of title and possession
Case Code Year
Case between Mathew vs Ann Thottakkara et al regarding declaration of title and possession

Quick Facts

Location
Pala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 04/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Joy Joseph vs Authorised Officer et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Pentatech Associates et al vs Benny Abraham regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Roy Joseph vs Tomy Joseph regarding partition and fixation of boundary.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Remya Sabu vs Vineesh Vijayan et al regarding declaration of title and Mandatory Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sudhamani vs Raju et al regarding declaration of title, right of easement and cancellation of sale deed.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won