Case Summary
A restoration petition filed by Sarojini was allowed by the court against Gopinathan.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition filed by Sarojini.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Cost paid. Petition stands allowed
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sarojini
- Party Age
- 53
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gopinathan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.Shanmughan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V.Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of petition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of the petition
Evidence:
Cost paid. Petition stands allowed
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2014