Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 383/2018

Case between Sarojini K.N. vs K.N. Bhaskaran, Santha Devi K.N. regarding partition and injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-02-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Sarojini K.N., has filed a suit for partition and injunction concerning a property claimed by the first defendant, K.N. Bhaskaran, based on a gift deed. The court examined the validity of the gift deed and allowed for the amendment of the plaint to include challenges to this document.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for amendment in the plaint to challenge the validity of the gift deed. This was deemed necessary for fair adjudication and resolving controversies between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for amendment in the plaint to challenge the validity of the gift deed. This was deemed necessary for fair adjudication and resolving controversies between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The amendment was necessary for fair adjudication of the disputes concerning the property ownership.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The amendment was necessary for fair adjudication of the disputes concerning the property ownership.
Supporting Evidence
The amendment sought for is necessary for fair adjudication of the suit and to resolve the entire controversies in between the parties.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition stands allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sarojini K.N.
Party Age
77
Relation
D/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.N. Bhaskaran
Party Age
82
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santha Devi K.N.
Party Age
71
Relation
D/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.M. Alias
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.V. Shiji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
E.G. Ambily
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.J. Solamon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition for amendment was allowed subject to law of limitation.
Evidence:
the amendment sought for is necessary and petition stands allowed subject to law of limitation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The court identified this document as crucial in adjudicating the suit and addressing the petitioner's challenge against it.
Reference:
No. 1435/67

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sarojini K.N. vs K.N. Bhaskaran, Santha Devi K.N. regarding partition and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sarojini K.N. vs K.N. Bhaskaran, Santha Devi K.N. regarding partition and injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won