Case Summary
Sameer Fayiz and Fousiya sought delivery of property from Aminabi, Fathima Farhana, and Femi represented by guardian, with the delivery now recorded and petition closed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property Delivery recorded
Case Type
Property Delivery Dispute
Final Judgment
No
The court closed the petition after the delivery of the property was recorded.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Delivery of property was effected.
Delivery of property was effected.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Delivery of property was effected.
Delivery of property was effected.
Supporting Evidence
Delivery is recorded.
Judgment Evidence:
Delivery of property effected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sameer Fayiz
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- Not mentioned
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fousiya
- Relation
- Not mentioned
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aminabi
- Relation
- Not mentioned
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fathima Farhana
- Relation
- Not mentioned
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Femi - Minor
- Relation
- Represented by guardianmother 1st respondent
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.Mehroof Shihab
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate
- Appearance Type
- Not mentioned
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Property Delivery
Outcome:
Recorded
Description:
Delivery of property recorded after petition closure.
Evidence:
Delivery is recorded.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Property Delivery Dispute
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2015