Case Summary
Decree holder Karunakaran filed a case against Meenakshi and multiple other judgment debtors regarding property delivery, which has been resolved with delivery of property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property delivery
Case Type
Property Delivery Dispute
Final Judgment
No
Property has been delivered, recorded, and the Execution Petition (EP) has been closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Property delivered. Delivery recorded. EP closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Karunakaran
- Party Age
- 63
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Meenakshi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chinnammu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Narayani
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subrhmaniyan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saraswathy
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sasidharan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sulochana
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suneesh
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sujith
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sumitha
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suchitha
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abdul Hameed
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Property Delivery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Property delivered to the decree holder.
Evidence:
Property delivered. Delivery recorded. EP closed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Property Delivery Dispute
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2017