Case Summary
Salih, the petitioner, filed a petition seeking eviction of Kunhalankutty under the Kerala Building (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965. The court allowed the petition based on a compromise agreement.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction as per compromise petition
Case Type
Eviction under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the Rent Control Petition based on a compromise petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Rent Control Petition allowed as per compromise petition and it shall form part of decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Salih
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o Kunhahammed @ Kunhibava
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhalankutty
- Party Age
- 80
- Relation
- S/o Moideen
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.C.P.Jamshid Rahman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Eviction of Kunhalankutty as per compromise petition
Evidence:
Rent Control Petition allowed as per compromise petition and it shall form part of decree.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Eviction under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Eviction
Case Code
Case between Salih vs Kunhalankutty regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Salih vs Kunhalankutty regarding eviction