Case Summary
Petitioner Sakkariya filed a petition under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act against respondent Abdullakkutty. The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by the petitioner under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petition filed by the petitioner under section 5(1) of Kerala Building (lease and rent control) Act. Counsel for the petitioner reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the petitioner is called. Absent. No representation. Hence Petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sakkariya
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o. Dr. T. Ahammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdullakkutty
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o. Muhammed Kutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Unknown
Evidence:
Unknown
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sakkariya vs Abdullakkutty regarding tenancy dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Sakkariya vs Abdullakkutty regarding tenancy dispute