Case Summary
The plaintiffs are Sajeev Shamsudheen and his wife Remeena. They filed a suit which was heard and rejected by the court due to balance court fees not being remitted.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected by the court due to the non-remittance of balance court fees.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected for failing to remit balance court fees.
The suit was rejected for failing to remit balance court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected for failing to remit balance court fees.
The suit was rejected for failing to remit balance court fees.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was rejected for failing to remit balance court fees.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Suit rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sajeev Shamsudheen
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Remeena
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Antony A.E.
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K. Raveendranatha Kartha
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gayathridevi
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sreekanth Soman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anish Gopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bhagyalakshmi V.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fees.
Evidence:
Balance court fees not remitted. Hence Suit rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sajeev Shamsudheen et al vs Antony A.E. et al regarding rejection of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sajeev Shamsudheen et al vs Antony A.E. et al regarding rejection of suit