Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 314 OF 2018

Case between Saifudheen vs Muhammed Jisar regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-07-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a plaintiff, Saifudheen, who claims that the defendant, Muhammed Jisar, borrowed Rs. 3,50,000 and failed to make agreed repayments. The defendant did not challenge the allegations, leading to the plaintiff's claims being accepted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover Rs. 3,50,000 along with interest from the defendant. The defendant was ordered to cover the costs of the suit as well.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realise an amount of Rs.3,50,000 with interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the date of suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover Rs. 3,50,000 along with interest from the defendant. The defendant was ordered to cover the costs of the suit as well.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
I find no reason to disbelieve the plaintiff. So, the plaintiff has proved his case by adduced cogent and reliable evidence and the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows:- 1.Plaintiff is allowed to realise an amount of Rs.3,50,000/(Rupees three lakh and fifty thousand only) from the defendant with interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the date of suit till realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saifudheen
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Jisar
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Karar dated 24-6-2017, Lawyer notice dated 19-7-2018, Postal receipt, Acknowledgement card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Najmudheen.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.C.P.Jamshid Rahman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff allowed to recover Rs. 3,50,000 from the defendant with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows:- 1.Plaintiff is allowed to realise an amount of Rs.3,50,000/-(Rupees three lakh and fifty thousand only) from the defendant with interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the date of suit till realization.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
2.Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the terms of the loan including the amount borrowed and agreement to pay monthly dividends.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served to the defendant demanding payment of the borrowed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2(a)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the delivery of the lawyer notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2(b)
Document Type: Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Verifies that the notice was received by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Saifudheen vs Muhammed Jisar regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Saifudheen vs Muhammed Jisar regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sun, 06/24/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won