Case Summary
Multiple petitioners filed a case seeking a final decree based on a commission report.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Final decree
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court passed the final decree as requested by the petitioner based on the commission report.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
It is submitted by the petitioner that final decree can be passed as per commission report.
Judgment Evidence:
Final decree passed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saidalikutty
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Kareem
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Khairunnisa
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Musthafa
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Iyyathumma
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chittakath Variyathazath Soudhabi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chittakath Variyathazhath Fathimath Suhara
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Chittakath Variyathazath Soudhabi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Final decree
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petitioner's request for final decree was granted based on the commission report.
Evidence:
Final decree passed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
FDA
Case Code Year
2015