Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 407 OF 2014

Case between Saidali et al vs Sakkeer Husain et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V., B.A, LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2017-02-09
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Saidali and Nazar, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants, Sakkeer Husain, Vasu, and Manikandan. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs were absent and unrepresented.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiffs due to their absence and the lack of representation. The defendants were awarded costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs were absent and did not represent their case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed with costs to defendants.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Saidali (54 years) Thekke Painkal House, Kuttippuram Amsom, Painkannur Desom and Post, PIN 679 590, Tirur Taluk Nazar (31 years) Thekke Peediyakkal House, Kuttippuram Amsom, Painkannur Desom and Post, PIN 679 590, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Sakkeer Husain (38 years) Velutha parambil house, Kuttippuram Amsom, Painkannur Desom and Post, PIN 679 590, Tirur Taluk Vasu (56 years) Ungungal house, Kuttippuram Amsom, Painkannur Desom and Post, PIN 679 590, Tirur Taluk Manikandan (50 years) Cherukuzhi padikkal house, Kuttippuram Amsom, Painkannur Desom and Post, PIN 679 590, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Suit for injunction dismissed.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed with costs to defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases