Case Summary
Saidalavi, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Muhammed seeking specific performance. The court rejected the plaint due to failure to produce balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Plaint rejected due to failure to produce balance court fee
Case Type
Civil Suit - Specific Performance
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint filed by Saidalavi seeking specific performance against Muhammed.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff failed to produce Balance Court Fee. Hence the plaint is rejected under order 7, Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saidalavi
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o Muhammedkutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o Aydru
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Specific Performance
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaint rejected due to failure to produce balance court fee
Evidence:
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff failed to produce Balance Court Fee. Hence the plaint is rejected under order 7, Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Specific Performance
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Saidalavi vs Muhammed regarding specific performance
Case Code Year
Case between Saidalavi vs Muhammed regarding specific performance