Case Summary
Plaintiff Muhammad filed suit against defendants seeking specific performance. The court rejected the plaint due to failure to produce balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not granted - Plaint Rejected
Case Type
Civil Suit - Specific Performance
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's suit for specific performance due to failure to produce the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Not mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff failed to produce balance court fee inspite of availing several chances from 17.09.2014. Hence the plaint is rejected under Order 7, Rule 11(c) of Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammad
- Party Age
- 53
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Assainar
- Party Age
- 58
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ayisha
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o. Assainar, D/o. Kadavil Valappil Muhammed.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhalan
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o. Thekkinithethil Muhammad Kutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ramlath
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o. Kunhalan, D/o. Aalath Beeran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nafeesakkutty
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- W/o. Thekkinithethil Muhammad, D/o. Valluvankadavil Bavu @ Assainar
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C.T. Joffy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Pratheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. T.R. Vijayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Deepa Madhu
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- .V. Rathish
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Specific Performance
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaint Rejected due to failure to produce balance court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff failed to produce balance court fee inspite of availing several chances from 17.09.2014. Hence the plaint is rejected under Order 7, Rule 11(c) of Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Specific Performance
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammad et al vs Assainar et al regarding specific performance
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammad et al vs Assainar et al regarding specific performance