Case Summary
Saidalavi filed a suit for injunction against Kareem and another defendant. The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saidalavi
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kareem
- Party Age
- 40
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saidalavi
- Party Age
- 45
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P. Sreehari
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. T. Ali Hassan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- E.C. Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit for injunction was filed.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Saidalavi vs Kareem et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Saidalavi vs Kareem et al regarding injunction