Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 243 OF 2017

Case between Safiya vs Noushad et al regarding declaration

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-07-24
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Safiya filed a suit for declaration against Noushad, Thajudheen, and Aneesha. The court found that the suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the court fee and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was rejected due to lack of balance court fee and absence of the plaintiff during the hearing. The case was pronounced ex parte.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected due to procedural deficiencies.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is rejected u/o VII Rule 11.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Safiya (52 years) Tholantakath House, Nirmaruthoor .P.O., Vattakinar, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Noushad (37 years) Thajudheen (34 years) Aneesha (30 years) Tholantakath House, Sabiya Manzil, Nirmaruthoor .P.O., amsom & desom, Vallikanhiram, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit is one for declaration.
Evidence:
Suit is rejected u/o VII Rule 11.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases