Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.734/2018

Case between S. Balakrishnan vs Kudumbi Seva Sangam Kerala State et al regarding suit dismissal for default.

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-08
Duration
Case Code No.
734
Case Closed
Mon, 01/08/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

S. Balakrishnan filed a suit against Kudumbi Seva Sangam Kerala State and others. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not interested in adducing evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's lack of interest in proceeding with evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's lack of interest in proceeding with evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not pursue the case by not adducing evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff did not pursue the case by not adducing evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in adducing evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S. Balakrishnan
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kudumbi Seva Sangam Kerala State
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.S. Ramachandran
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.V. Bhaskaran
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.R. Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.S. Letha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreerekha.K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Pavan Jose Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Soloman Baby
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vimal Dev.D.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.P. Santhoshkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to the plaintiff not being interested in adducing evidence.
Evidence:
Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in adducing evidence. Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2018

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 01/08/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rahath Hakkeem vs Rajani Sreekumar regarding mandatory injunction
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ajay Kumar Gupta et al vs Shajan Joseph.K.R. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Smt. Baby Ravi vs Sajini Nandakumar regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Metadata Technologies vs M/s. Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit not pressed.
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V P Rajamma vs Devassy alias Thomas regarding restoration of suit
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won