ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 393 OF 2015

Case between Rohini vs Saithu Haji et al regarding injunction

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V.

Order Date

2017-03-30

Duration

Approximately 1 year

Case Closed

Thu, 03/30/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rohini filed a suit for injunction against Saithu Haji et al. The court dismissed the suit due to the pending Rent Control Petition against the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Not specified

Case Type

Civil Suit - Injunction

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit for injunction due to the existence of a Rent Control Petition against the plaintiff.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for injunction. Since Rent Control Petition is filed against the plaintiff for evicting him lawfully and in the written statement it is stated by the defendant that they are not intending to evict the plaintiff forcefully and in view of Rent Control Petition 73/2016 filed against this plaintiff under section 11(3) & 11(4), there is no necessity to proceed with the application. Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Rohini
Party Age: 39
Relation: W/o. Muraleedharan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Saithu Haji
Party Age: 66
Relation: S/o. Kadavukarakath Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Ameen
Party Age: 60
Relation: Manager

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Febi
Party Age: 34
Relation: C/o. Kadavukarakathu Saithu Haji

Plaintiffs Documents

Not mentioned

Defendants Documents