Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 180/2025

Case between Rice Core Natural Foods LLP vs Arun.K.S regarding temporary injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-09-08
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Rice Core Natural Foods LLP as the petitioner seeking a temporary injunction against Arun.K.S, the respondent, concerning a dispute over property possession and cultivation rights for pineapple. The petitioner claims ownership while the respondent contests this based on an unregistered agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the application for a temporary injunction, stating that while the petitioner holds registered title, the respondent has established a possession that cannot be disturbed without following due process of law.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The respondent's possession was established under agreements from the previous owners and the significant investment made in cultivation.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The application is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Rice Core Natural Foods LLP (Age not specified years) Panamkuzhy Kara, Kombanadu Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Arun.K.S (Age not specified years) Kudiyil House, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam District – 683 550

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petitioner requested an order of injunction restraining the respondent from causing obstruction to his peaceful possession.
Evidence:
In the result, The application is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Exhibits
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents marked from the petitioner's side.
Reference:
Exts.A1 to A
Document Type: Exhibits
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Documents marked from the respondent's side.
Reference:
Exts.B1 to B2
Document Type: Commissioner Report and Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Documents providing evidence related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1 series

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases