Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.747/2019

Case between Rev.Fr.Thomas Panicker vs Arun Chandukandi @ Arun C.K regarding setting aside an exparte decree.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-06-11
Duration
approximately-1 year 7 months
Case Code No.
747
Case Closed
Wed, 06/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Rev.Fr.Thomas Panicker as the plaintiff and Arun Chandukandi @ Arun C.K as the defendant. The defendant filed a petition to set aside an exparte decree passed against him.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petitions filed by the defendant to set aside the exparte decree. The court found that there was no valid reason for the delay in filing the petition.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petitions filed by the defendant to set aside the exparte decree. The court found that there was no valid reason for the delay in filing the petition.
Key Reasoning:
The court found no evidence to support the defendant's claims of not receiving summons.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
There are absolutely no materials before the Court to show that the petitioner was prevented from filing the petition.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 01/2024 and RP 229/2024 are dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rev.Fr.Thomas Panicker
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arun Chandukandi @ Arun C.K
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Latheesh R.Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.I.Alexander Panicker
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Condonation of delay of 339 days in filing petition to set aside exparte decree.
Evidence:
Hence, the petition for condonation of delay is only to be dismissed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Setting aside the exparte decree dated 20/10/2023.
Evidence:
In view of my finding on point No.1, this point does not germane for consideration.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 06/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Satheesh et al vs Ajayan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Babu Chandhar et al vs Sarada Chandhatty et al regarding Partition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Parukutti Amma et al vs Abdul Rahim regarding restoration of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Piyoos vs Sheemol regarding setting aside the order in RP.No.259/2024
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won