Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 197/2022

Case between The Residents of Illithondu part of the 9th Ward of Thalayolaparambu Gramapanchayath et al vs Antony Mathew et al regarding A.J.John – Kalambukadu road

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-01-13
Duration
Case Code No.
197
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the residents of Illithondu part of the 9th Ward of Thalayolaparambu Gramapanchayath who are beneficiaries of a roadway. The court dismissed the suit due to absence of the plaintiffs and defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court found both parties absent and not ready for evidence, resulting in the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court found both parties absent and not ready for evidence, resulting in the dismissal of the suit for default.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Residents of Illithondu part of the 9th Ward of Thalayolaparambu Gramapanchayath
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jacob.K.J.
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
James Jacob
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Antony Mathew
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Martin
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
D.Subhash Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anjana Lakshmi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Feba Elma Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to absence of the plaintiffs and defendants.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom Taluk
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M V Chacko vs Maya Sibi et al regarding settlement.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.N. Manoharan et al vs Deena Panicker et al regarding suit for permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Vijayalakshmi @ Mariya et al vs Cyriac Mathew et al regarding suit dismissed for default.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shaji et al vs Renjith Monai et al regarding a compromise petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Devaraj vs Sajimon regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won