Case Summary
Remya, the petitioner, filed a petition to set aside an Exparte Decree. The respondents, Dhanalekshmi Bank and its General Manager, were represented, but the petitioner was absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition by Remya was dismissed for default due to her absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Petitioner was absent and made no representation in court.
Petitioner was absent and made no representation in court.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner absent. No representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Remya
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dhanalekshmi Bank
- Relation
- represented by its Branch Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Assistant General Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B.N.Haskar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R.Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Petition to set aside the Exparte Decree
Evidence:
Petition dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Remya vs Dhanalekshmi Bank et al regarding setting aside an Exparte Decree
Case Code Year
Case between Remya vs Dhanalekshmi Bank et al regarding setting aside an Exparte Decree