Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 289/2020

Case between Rekha Sunil Roy et al vs Aneesh Chandran K P regarding review of order in I.A. No. 11/2023

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-08-08
Duration
approximately-2 years 2 months 18 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a review petition filed by the additional 5th defendant, Aneesh Chandran K P, challenging an order allowing amendments to the plaint in the original suit. The plaintiff argues that the review petition discloses no error and seeks to enforce a parking space issue against the defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the review petition, setting aside the previous order in I.A. No. 11/2023 to rehear it based on the additional defendant's counter affidavit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the review petition, setting aside the previous order in I.A. No. 11/2023 to rehear it based on the additional defendant's counter affidavit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found merit in the review petition due to an error apparent on record regarding the consideration of the counter affidavit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found merit in the review petition due to an error apparent on record regarding the consideration of the counter affidavit.
Supporting Evidence
The court concluded that there was an error apparent on the record while passing the order in IA 11/2023 as the counter affidavit filed by the additional 5th defendant was omitted to be looked into.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the above petition is allowed. Order dated 07.03.2025 in IA 11/2023 is reviewed and order in IA 11/2023 is set aside to rehear the IA 11/2023 based on the counter affidavit of the 5th defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rekha Sunil Roy
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M N Kannanunni
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suchetha Kannan
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Head – Customer Relations, M/s Desai Homes
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
DD Platinum Planet Apartment Owners Association
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aneesh Chandran K P
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M P Ramnath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bepin Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sandhya S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shalu Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajesh Kottakkal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Deepak S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Antony Tharian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ajesh K Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Johnson Gomez
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N Ratheesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Suma Retheesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aravind Ajith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Binu Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Krishnapriya T M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mahesh Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Review of the order dated 07.03.2025 in IA 11/2023.
Evidence:
Accordingly I find merit in the petition.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Set Aside
Description:
Order dated 07.03.2025 in IA 11/2023 is reviewed and order in IA 11/2023 is set aside to rehear the IA 11/2023 based on the counter affidavit of the 5th defendant.
Evidence:
Order dated 07.03.2025 in IA 11/2023 is reviewed and order in IA 11/2023 is set aside to rehear the IA 11/2023 based on the counter affidavit of the 5th defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Review Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rekha Sunil Roy et al vs Aneesh Chandran K P regarding review of order in I.A. No. 11/2023
Case Code Year
Case between Rekha Sunil Roy et al vs Aneesh Chandran K P regarding review of order in I.A. No. 11/2023

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 06/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between John Douglas Bivera et al vs Percy Prakasia et al regarding review petition
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Review Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mrs. Sandhya S Pai vs M Vijaya Sankar regarding review petition.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Chandralekha et al vs Rugmini Ammal et al regarding review of a court order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Bhanumathy et al vs Rajagopalan regarding review petition in Original Suit No.1391/2005
MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Bhanumathy et al vs Radhakrishnan et al regarding review of judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.1396/2005
MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Review Petition Defendant Won