Case Summary
Reethamma filed a restoration petition against Shaji and others. The court considered the reasons stated in the affidavit and allowed the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition filed by Reethamma.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was allowed based on the reasons stated in the affidavit.
The petition was allowed based on the reasons stated in the affidavit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The petition was allowed based on the reasons stated in the affidavit.
Judgment Evidence:
Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit this petition is allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Reethamma
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shaji
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Remani
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Babu
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Omana
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed.
Evidence:
Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit this petition is allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2025