Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 211 OF 2013

Case between Razaq et al vs Saidalavi et al regarding permanent injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff-Tirur
Judge
SRI. BIJUV.G., B.Sc., LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2015-02-10
Duration
1 year 6 months 20 days
Case Closed
Tue, 02/10/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs, including minors represented by guardian mother, filed a suit seeking permanent injunction. However, as the plaintiffs were absent during the final hearing, the suit was dismissed with costs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for permanent injunction was dismissed with costs as the plaintiffs were absent during the final hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit - Permanent injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for permanent injunction was dismissed with costs as the plaintiffs were absent during the final hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed with cost.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Razaq
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o, represented by Power of Attorney Holder 2nd plaintiff Muneera
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muneera
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o Razaq
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ayisha
Party Age
16
Relation
D/o Razaq
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Hasna
Party Age
14
Relation
D/o Razaq
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Hashim
Party Age
10
Relation
S/o Razaq
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nehla
Party Age
5
Relation
D/o Razaq
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saidalavi
Relation
S/o Saidali
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashraf
Relation
S/o Kunhimuhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Vipin Chandrasekhar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.P.Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Permanent injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Razaq et al vs Saidalavi et al regarding permanent injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Razaq et al vs Saidalavi et al regarding permanent injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 07/22/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 02/10/2015 - 12:00
From
Sun, 02/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between PuthanPurayil Aboobakker vs Koottath Saharoob et al regarding permanent injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Permanent Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalodi Muhammedkutty vs Karattu Assainar regarding water canal obstruction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Permanent Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Mandakathingal Abdul Rasheed vs Thendath Chenattil Avarankutty's children et al regarding right of way
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Permanent Injunction Defendant Won