Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Raveendran P N and Thankamani, are the owners-in-possession of a property and are seeking to restrain the defendants from trespassing and widening a pathway through their property. The defendants have failed to respond to the suit, leading to an exparte decision.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and committing waste or mischief.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendants from trespassing into the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established their ownership and possession of the property without any rebuttal from the defendants.
The plaintiffs established their ownership and possession of the property without any rebuttal from the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs established their ownership and possession of the property without any rebuttal from the defendants.
The plaintiffs established their ownership and possession of the property without any rebuttal from the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiffs. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiffs.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; 1.The defendants and their men are hereby restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and committing waste or mischief to the plaint schedule property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Raveendran P N
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o Late Nanu
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thankamani
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o Raveendran P N
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreenivasan V K
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o Karuthakochu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joseph Thomas @ Jose Pallikkunnel
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o Thomas
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Uthuppan Thomas
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o Thomas
Plaintiffs Documents
Cpoy of Sale Deed no. 205/1980, Tax Receipt
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Santhosh Kesavanath P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restrained the defendants and their men from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and committing waste or mischief.
Evidence:
In the result , the suit is decreed as follows; 1.The defendants and their men are hereby restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and committing waste or mischief to the plaint schedule property.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Sale Deed no. 205/1980 establishing plaintiffs' ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Tax receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax Receipt confirming tax payments related to the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Commission Report providing details relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Rough Sketch
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Rough sketch supporting the Commission Report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Raveendran P N et al vs Sreenivasan V K et al regarding simple injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Raveendran P N et al vs Sreenivasan V K et al regarding simple injunction