Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 102 OF 2019

Case between Raveendran et al vs Thankamani et al regarding partition

Court
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-12-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Case between Raveendran and Karthiayani vs Thankamani, Geetha, Preethi, Shani, and Adharva regarding partition of the property owned jointly.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
Preliminary decree for partition passed based on mutually agreed terms.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Partition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Raveendran (52 years) Mooppil House, Thalakkad amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Karthiayani (76 years) Mooppil House, Thalakkad amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Thankamani (57 years) Mooppil House, Thalakkad amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Geetha (54 years) Mooppil House, Thalakkad amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Preethi (49 years) Mooppil House, Thalakkad amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Shani (35 years) Mooppil House, Thalakkad amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Adharva (11 years) Mooppil House, Thalakkad amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs granted separate share in the property
Evidence:
Suit decreed and preliminary decree for partition passed

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Genealogical table
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows relationship between plaintiffs and defendants
Reference:
Plaint A schedule
Document Type: Property Documents
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original property owned by Mooppil Krishnankutty
Reference:
Plaint B schedule
Document Type: Interim Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Settlement reached between parties to partition property
Reference:
I.A. No. 2366/2019 (Razi)
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Confirmation of compromise as beneficial for the minor's interest
Reference:
Order XXXII, Rule 7 (IA) - No specific exhibit number
Document Type: Application
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Permitted compromise for partition of property
Reference:
I.A. No. 2366/2019

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases