Case Summary
Case between Raveendran and Karthiayani vs Thankamani, Geetha, Preethi, Shani, and Adharva regarding partition of the property owned jointly.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Partition
Final Judgment
No
Preliminary decree for partition passed based on mutually agreed terms.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Raveendran
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Karthiayani
- Party Age
- 76
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thankamani
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Geetha
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Preethi
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shani
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Adharva
- Party Age
- 11
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.Sreehari
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. U. V. Sumith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs granted separate share in the property
Evidence:
Suit decreed and preliminary decree for partition passed
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Genealogical table
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows relationship between plaintiffs and defendants
Reference:
Plaint A schedule
Document Type:
Property Documents
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original property owned by Mooppil Krishnankutty
Reference:
Plaint B schedule
Document Type:
Interim Order
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Settlement reached between parties to partition property
Reference:
I.A. No. 2366/2019 (Razi)
Document Type:
Certificate
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Confirmation of compromise as beneficial for the minor's interest
Reference:
Order XXXII, Rule 7 (IA) - No specific exhibit number
Document Type:
Application
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Permitted compromise for partition of property
Reference:
I.A. No. 2366/2019
Case Classification
Case Type
Partition
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition of property
Case Code
Case between Raveendran et al vs Thankamani et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Raveendran et al vs Thankamani et al regarding partition
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement