Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 58 OF 2015

Case between Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath vs Neeliyattuverkkal Kunhayissu et al regarding Partition

Court
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-11-25
Duration
4 years 10 months
Case Closed
Mon, 11/25/2019 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Involves a partition suit over property with multiple defendants and intricate genealogical relationships.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiff granted 990 shares, defendants issued varied shares as per genealogical records.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decreed partition of property and allotment of shares.
Case Type
Partition
Final Judgment
No
Plaintiff granted 990 shares, defendants issued varied shares as per genealogical records.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence of rightful entitlement to specific shares.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed with specific share allocation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o. Kunhumarakkar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Neeliyattuverkkal Kunhayissu
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o. Kunhimuhammed Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Neeliyattuverkkal Pathumma
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o. Kunhimuhammed Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nalakath Fathima Beevi
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o. Puthiyakath Kinattingal Alikutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subaida
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o. Puthiyakath Kinattingal Alikutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suhara
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o. Puthiyakath Kinattingal Alikutty
Plaintiffs Documents
07-02-2011 Ohari Avakasam Jenm Assignment Deed.
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decree for partition passed
Evidence:
Plaintiff adduced evidence in line with averments in the plaint, defendants remained ex parte and failed to adduce evidence

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Ohari Avakasam Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document marked as Exhibit A1 by plaintiff's witness
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Partition
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath vs Neeliyattuverkkal Kunhayissu et al regarding Partition
Case Code Year
Case between Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath vs Neeliyattuverkkal Kunhayissu et al regarding Partition

Quick Facts

Location
TIRUR
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 11/21/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 11/25/2019 - 12:00
From
Fri, 11/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Ramani vs Chundayil Ammunni Amma et al regarding Partition
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Hameed vs Muhammed regarding Partition
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Partition Unknown
Case between Raveendran et al vs Thankamani et al regarding partition
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF TIRUR
Partition Unknown
Case between Shamsudheen et al vs Muvumkunnath Moideenkutty et al regarding Partition
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunnekkattu Aboobacker's children vs Kunnekkattu Muhammed's children et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Plaintiff Won