Case Summary
Ratheesh.C.K is the plaintiff and Tajudeen.T.M is the defendant. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed because it was not pressed by the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Advanced. Suit not pressed. Memo filed. Sut dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ratheesh.C.K
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Tajudeen.T.M
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T.V.Eldho
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shinil Paul Mathews
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Reji Jacob
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anu Thampi
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
IA.4/2025 allowed.
Evidence:
IA.4/2025 allowed.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ratheesh.C.K vs Tajudeen.T.M regarding suit not pressed
Case Code Year
Case between Ratheesh.C.K vs Tajudeen.T.M regarding suit not pressed