Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 66/2021

Case between Ratheesh P.R et al vs Suseelkumar et al regarding Compromise Petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-02-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by Ratheesh P.R, filed a suit against the defendants Suseelkumar and K.K. Anitha. The suit was decided based on a compromise agreement accepted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise petition and decreed the suit as per the terms of the compromise agreement. No costs were awarded, and the court fee was to be refunded as per law.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise petition and decreed the suit as per the terms of the compromise agreement. No costs were awarded, and the court fee was to be refunded as per law.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Compromise petition filed, accepted being lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ratheesh P.R
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Soumya
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Adinav Ratheesh
Party Age
11
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thankamani
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suseelkumar
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.K. Anitha
Party Age
46
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise agreement
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.M. Alias
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.V. Shiji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.G. Sajeev Panickar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aneesha Mani
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Compromise petition filed, accepted being lawful. Suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ratheesh P.R et al vs Suseelkumar et al regarding Compromise Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Ratheesh P.R et al vs Suseelkumar et al regarding Compromise Petition

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won