Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 163 OF 2018

Case between Ramachandran et al vs Jamal et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. SUSHAMA.P.
Order Date
2019-05-30
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Ramachandran and others, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants, Jamal and Sajna. The suit was subsequently dismissed for default as the counsel for the plaintiffs reported no instructions.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default as the counsel for the plaintiffs reported no instructions.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default as the counsel for the plaintiffs reported no instructions.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ramachandran
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pattarmadathil N.P.Balameenakshi
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kottarath Kunhamutty @ Bava
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jamal
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajna
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.P.Praveen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.P.V.Vinunath
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.A.Mamu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P.Abdul Gafoor.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Suit for injunction was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Counsel for the plaintiff reported no-instruction. Hence suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ramachandran et al vs Jamal et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ramachandran et al vs Jamal et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 05/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sun, 05/31/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won