Case Summary
Raju, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Susan Shaji for the realization of money. Both parties were absent during the hearing, leading to the rejection of the plaint.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to both parties being absent and no balance court fee being remitted.
Key Reasoning:
Defendant did not need to present a case as the plaint was rejected.
Defendant did not need to present a case as the plaint was rejected.
Why Defendant Won:
Defendant did not need to present a case as the plaint was rejected.
Defendant did not need to present a case as the plaint was rejected.
Supporting Evidence
Both sides absent, represented. No Balance Court Fee remitted. Sufficient opportunities given.
Judgment Evidence:
Both sides absent, represented. No Balance Court Fee remitted. Sufficient opportunities given. Plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Raju
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Susan Shaji
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B.L.Prasanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.S.Rajiv
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realisation of Money
Case Code
Case between Raju vs Susan Shaji regarding Realisation of Money
Case Code Year
Case between Raju vs Susan Shaji regarding Realisation of Money